Subj: Christian Education: Still Schizophenic 
Date: 9/21/2002 8:16:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: ICE@reply.mb00.net
To: Kevin4VFT@aol.com
Sent from the Internet


                                         September 21, 2002

Dear Subscriber:

     Earlier this week, I visited Stanford University's
book store.  It is magnificent.  It is huge -- on the scale
of a large Barnes & Noble store.  Students can select from
tens of thousands of academic titles.

     Visit any Christian college book store.  There will be
a rack of LEFT BEHIND novels, half a dozen biographies of
Billy Graham, and assorted examples of trinkets for Christ.
There is nothing that points out more clearly the
overpriced, overrated nature of Christian higher education
than a visit to a Christian college book store.  Christian
parents, themselves poorly educated, don't recognize this.

     At Stanford, students read serious books, and lots of
them.  At Piddly Ridge Bible Baptist College, they don't.

     But that's not the whole story.  In the downstairs
area of Stanford's book store is the textbook section.  It
is small, and the books are mediocre, when not actually
third-rate propaganda, which in the social sciences is
often.  Stanford's professors are assigning Leftist puffery
that is not up to the academic standards of the books
upstairs.

     The problem is, the textbooks are probably the same in
the Piddly Ridge campus book store.  Anyway, the textbooks
at Piddly Ridge are just as liberal, though maybe dumbed-
down.  There is not one publishing house that publishes
textbooks for Christian colleges.  Even if there were, you
would not be able to tell much difference between its
textbooks and the standard humanist ones.

     The higher you go in Christian education, the more
expensive it gets, and the less difference there is between
the secularists and the Christians.  Christian parents
shell out 15,000 after-tax dollars a year for four years to
tiny Christian colleges with poor libraries, so that their
children can be assigned secular textbooks without negative
comment in the classroom.  These secular textbooks are
taught at face value by humanist university-certified
Ph.D's who still believe 90% of what they were taught in
grad school -- or, more accurately, 90% of what they
remember being taught, which isn't much.

     Now let's drop down one level.


THE CHRONOLOGY TEST

     Here is my challenge.  Pick up any Christian high
school textbook in world history.  Go to the chapter on
Egypt, or maybe the chapter on the Fertile Crescent:
Babylon, etc.  See what date it begins with.  I offer you a
challenge: is there any date earlier than 2300 B.C.?  Of
course there is.  This is a warning sign of the problem at
hand.

     Now get your Bible.  Let's do a little spade work.
Begin with I Kings 6:1.

     And it came to pass in the four hundred and
     eightieth year after the children of Israel were
     come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year
     of Solomon's reign over Israel, in the month Zif,
     which is the second month, that he began to build
     the house of the LORD.

When did Solomon start building the temple?  Around 950
B.C., give or take a decade.  So, add 480 years to 950.
You get 1430.  That was the date of the Exodus, give or
take a decade.

     Next, consider Galatians 3:16-18. 

     Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises
     made.  He saith not, And to seeds, as of many;
     but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
     And this I say, that the covenant, that was
     confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which
     was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot
     disannul, that it should make the promise of none
     effect.  For if the inheritance be of the law, it
     is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham
     by promise.

The law was given in the year of the Exodus.  When was the
covenant of promise established?  This probably refers to
God's promise to Abram just before Abram entered Canaan
(Gen. 12:1).  So, add 430 to 1430.  We get 1860 B.C.

     When did Abram enter Canaan?  Shortly after the death
of Terah, who died at age of 205 (Gen. 11:32).  So, to
determine when Terah was born, add 205 to 1860.  We get
2065 B.C.

     Add up the chronologies of Genesis 11:10-24.  These
chronologies are exact.  There are no gaps.  From the birth
of Shem's son, Arphaxad, two years after the flood began,
until the birth of Terah, was 222 years.  Add 222 years to
the birthdate of Terah: 2065 + 222 = 2287.  That was the
year of Noah's flood, assuming that Solomon began
construction of the temple in 950 B.C. 

     This means that no social artifact remains that was
created earlier than about 2300 B.C. unless the item
somehow survived the flood, which is highly doubtful.

     If the Bible is true, then all dates for any dynasty
or events that are older than about 2250 B.C. are fake.

     Look at any ancient history textbook written for
Christian schools.  See if you find a reference to this
chronology of Noah's flood.  Then see if there is a
discussion of its implications for our understanding of
ancient history.  See if there is a revised chronology
offered to counter the standard humanist textbook
chronology.

     How many Christian parents ever apply the chronology
test to see how consistently biblical their children's
ancient history textbook is?  Not many.  Not any, I
suspect.  This never occurs to them.  Sadly, this includes
the textbook writers, who use standard textbooks to writer
their knock-off versions for the Christian school market.
This is baptized education.  It's the one example of
baptism where the Baptists who write the curriculum
materials use sprinkling rather than immersion.


QUEER STUDIES FOR JESUS
    
     Christian promoters of something they call Christian
classical education have offered what they claim is a pure
form of classical education.  It isn't, of course.  It's a
whitewashed version.  It's as phony as a three-dollar bill
-- in more ways than one.

     Any mother who decides to adopt Christian classical
education for her children should first read Robert
Flaceliere's book, Love In Ancient Greece (New York: Crown,
1962).  Chapter 3 is titled, "Homosexuality."  Here, we
read:

          Many Greeks, moreover, did not feel in the
     least ashamed of admitting that homosexuality was
     held in more honour among them than anywhere else
     in the world (p. 63).

     Uneducated mothers, desperate to give their children
the education that, by the grace of God, they never
received, are rushing to adopt airbrushed classical
education programs that indoctrinate their children in the
wonders of a society built forthrightly on constant warfare
("The Iliad") and homosexuality.  Not only are their
children never exposed to the history of the religious and
philosophical war between Athens and Jerusalem, they are
taught to love Athens.  They are given a dumbed-down
nineteenth-century humanist education in the name of
Christ. 

     Nobody in the Christian curriculum business tells
mothers the truth.  Mothers are being provided with what
ought to be called "queer studies for Jesus," but this is
not the best advertising slogan to sell mothers on the
benefits of a classical Christian curriculum.  The
promoters palm off queer studies as Christian, and the
naive, trusting mothers buy it. 

     I ask: How can a Christian worldview curriculum be
taught on the basis of awe-inspired respect for a pagan
society built on homosexuality?  If there really is no
neutrality, as Christian worldview educators like to say
(but don't really believe or understand), then why was
classical Greek thought and culture so terrific?  If the
classical Greeks are worth studying for their own sake,
then why aren't queer studies worth studying, too?  It's
the same academic discipline. 

     The level of confusion in Christian education is
matched only by the level of outright deception.  From
classical Greece to the phony painting of George Washington
praying on one knee in the snow at Valley Forge, Christian
students are the victims of one long deception.  (The
Valley Force event never happened.  It's pure mytho-history
for Christians.)

     Things are better than they were in 1961, when
Rushdoony's Intellectual Schizophrenia was published.
While most seminary professors today are as committed to
neutral education, accreditation by pagan humanists, and
the benefits of Christians' staying in the public schools
as their predecessors were in 1961, millions of laymen have
begun to catch on.  Epistemologically, these laymen are way
ahead of most Ph.D-holding academics in clerical robes.
Home school mothers have begun to figure out what the
intellectual war is all about.  There were no Christian
home schools in 1961.  The Thoburns' Fairfax Christian
School
had been open only for one year in 1961.  Today,
parents are pulling their children out of the public
schools by the millions.

     These parents are well-intentioned, but Christian
curriculum writers keep returning to Greece, like a dog to
its vomit.  They just can't stay away.  Like moths drawn to
a flame, so are Christian curriculum writers drawn to
Greece and Rome.  "You just gotta give your kids a little
culture.  Don't let them grow up like you did, a slave to
the narrow worldview of the Bible.  Get some culture!"
This sales pitch has been selling classical Greek queer
studies to Christian parents for over 1,800 years.  They
keep believing this sales pitch because they have not read
the primary sources of classical civilization.  In the late
19th century, those humanist educators who translated the
classics left the sexual perversion passages in the
original languages.  No need to ruffle the perceptions of
the masses!  Also, no need to get the translations
suppressed by the censors, which would have happened, so
gross were the Greeks.

     What we need is a Christian anti-classical curriculum.
But Christian parents have been seduced by the peddlers of
airbrushed classical culture.  "My boy needs some culture!"
He does, indeed, but not that culture.  However, the blind
continue to lead the blind into the academic ditch.

    
CONCLUSION

     We have come a long way over the last 40 years.  By
"we," I mean Christian Reconstructionists, who have broken
with the pietist-humanist alliance, and home school
parents, who have broken with the public schools.  But the
home school curriculum materials are still pushing the
pietist-humanist alliance: the right-wing Enlightenment
baptized by a layer of phony history, e.g., George
Washington praying in the snow. 

     For the truth about Washington's religious views,
     read Paul F. Boller, Jr., George Washington and
     Religion
(Dallas, Texas: Southern Methodist
     University Press, 1963).  He was a grand master
     freemason (Alexandria Lodge 22) who refused to
     take the Lord's Supper.  This is not what you
     will find in the mytho-history textbooks of the
     Christian school movement.

     We should not expect our children to be told the truth
by college teachers whose income is based on a grand
deception, namely, that what is taught in the grad schools
that certified them is in any way consistent with
Christianity.  Academic accreditation guarantees
compromise.  All Christian colleges are accredited by
pagans, who know exactly what they are doing. 

     We also should not expect the defenders of the
pietist-humanist alliance to abandon their worldview, even
though officially they proclaim that there is no
neutrality.  The basis of the pietist-humanist alliance is
the Christians' acceptance of neutrality.  The home school
curriculum writers are still suffering from what Rushdoony
called intellectual schizophrenia back in 1961.

     It takes time to reverse 1,800 years of compromise.
This is why Christian curriculum writers must begin with
Cornelius Van Til's apologetics, for it was Van Til who
first made a clean break and a clean sweep of the 1,800-
year compromise with classical Greek thought.  Greg
Bahnsen's Van Til's Apologetic: Readings & Analysis
(P&R, 1998), is the starting point.

     I have written an eighth grade curriculum: history,
Bible, English.  It begins with creation.  Maybe I'll do
the high school curriculum some day.  That's my goal.  But
if I don't get around to it, what with another decade of my
Economic Commentary on the Bible left to write, plus a
Christian version of The Wealth Of Nations, someone else
should.

     I'm sure there will be a pile of money offered by some
wealthy Christian foundation to a team of curriculum
writers to produce an anti-classical curriculum.  I am as
certain of this as I am that this team of writers is ready
and waiting to accept the offer. 

                                                 Sincerely,

                                                 Gary North



_______________

For a free subscription to this newsletter, send a blank e-
mail to: ice@add.postmastergeneral.com