CRAIGforCONGRESS

Missouri's 7th District, U.S. House of Representatives

 

 

 

Bringing LIBERTY to Capitol Hill -- 2008
OZARKS VIRTUAL TOWN HALL
Saturday Morning, February 9, 2008, 10:30am



A Discussion of The President's Saturday Morning Radio Address

Click here to listen to a replay of the February 9, 2008 Ozarks Virtual Town Hall

Notes and Summary of the President's Address -- "Senate Confirmation of Presidential Nominees"

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. One of the most important jobs of any President is to find good men and women to lead government agencies, preside over our courts, and provide vital services to the American people. So I have nominated talented individuals for these positions. Unfortunately, the Senate is not meeting its responsibility to consider these nominees in a timely manner. More than 180 of my nominees are waiting for confirmation. Some have been waiting for more than a year. As a result, careers have been put on hold, families have been placed in limbo, and our government has been deprived of the service of these fine nominees.

How the President Differs from the American vision of "Liberty Under God":

The President has nominated people to hold offices that have no Constitutional authority

  1. The Constitution is a document of "enumerated powers": the Federal Government has only those powers which are given to it by "We the People" in the Constitution.
  2. President Bush's nominees should not be confirmed, because the offices which his nominees would take upon confirmation should not exist in the first place.

President Bush's
Saturday Morning Radio Address

Another Perspective:
"Liberty Under God"

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. One of the most important jobs of any President is to find good men and women to lead government agencies, preside over our courts, and provide vital services to the American people. So I have nominated talented individuals for these positions. Unfortunately, the Senate is not meeting its responsibility to consider these nominees in a timely manner. More than 180 of my nominees are waiting for confirmation. Some have been waiting for more than a year. As a result, careers have been put on hold, families have been placed in limbo, and our government has been deprived of the service of these fine nominees. It is true that this is in large degree a partisan issue: had these exact same people been nominated by a Democrat President, the Democrat-controlled Senate would have already confirmed them.

It is also true that the lives of these individual nominees are being disrespected by the cowardice of senators who refuse to take a stand and cast a vote on the nominations.

The more fundamental issue is whether these government positions should be filled at all; whether they should exist at all. America's founding fathers

On Thursday I stood with many of these nominees at the White House. They are decent and talented people. The Senate needs to confirm them to address important issues, from the economy to public safety to national security.  
One of the most important institutions for America's economy is the Federal Reserve. The Fed decides monetary policy, and it sets key interest rates that have an impact on homeowners and businesses across our country. Yet the Senate has been delaying three of my nominations to the Fed for nearly 9 months. My nominees have valuable experience and skills, and I urge the Senate to confirm them as soon as possible. The Federal Reserve is one of the debasement of currency

refuses to be audited

history shrouded in secrecy.

Another important institution is the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA plays a vital role in keeping you safe when you fly. In October I nominated Bobby Sturgell to lead the FAA. Bobby has nearly 20 years of cockpit experience from his time as a Navy fighter pilot, Top Gun instructor, and commercial airline pilot. He's committed to addressing problems that have caused airline delays, and I urge senators to put politics aside and confirm him to office. Should the Federal Government direct traffic to keep FedEx and UPS trucks from crashing?

Did anyone in Washington D.C. lose their job over the catastrophic failure of 9/11? In a world of capitalism, CEO's and managers of Wall Street Corporations would have lost their jobs and seen stock prices plummet over such criminal negligence.

In this time of war, we need a strong Department of Justice. Yet the Senate has not voted on nominations for seven senior leadership positions at the department. One of those vacancies is for Deputy Attorney General. The Deputy Attorney General helps lead efforts to detect and prevent terrorist attacks at home. Is Osama bin Laden a criminal or a military enemy of war? Should the Department of Justice go after Osama like any other criminal, or should the Department of Defense treat this as an act of war?

President Bush is obviously completely confused on this vital issue.

I've selected an outstanding nominee for this position: Judge Mark Filip. This former prosecutor has earned a reputation for being fair-minded and dedicated. Several years ago the Senate confirmed him unanimously for a lifetime position on the Federal bench. Now I ask senators to confirm him once again so he can help keep our nation safe. Attorney General used to be the lawyer who represented the United States before the Supreme Court.

Look at the vast scope of the Justice Department today:
USDOJ: About DOJ - Alphabetical List of Agencies

The vast majority of these agencies are beyond the scope of Constitutional authority: the are unconstitutional

As senators confirm these nominees, they must also confirm judges to the Federal bench. I have nominated highly qualified individuals who will rule by the letter of the law, not the whim of the gavel. Unfortunately, the Senate continues to delay votes for 28 of my judicial nominees. Three of my nominees for the Court of Appeals have waited nearly 600 days. These delays are irresponsible, they undermine the cause of justice, and I call on the United States Senate to give these nominees the up or down vote they deserve. Most judicial nominees of Republican Presidents, confirmed by Republican Senators, have not kept their oath to support and protect the constitution.

Republican judicial nominees have been pro-abortion and anti-constitution.

Democrats in the Senate are afraid to confirm these nominees, or else they are playing the nominees for publicity: the nominees claim they will defend the Constitution on issues which are contrary to Democrat directions, so the Senate Democrats resist confirming their nomination, even though they know that the nominees are really not going to act on the issues that gain publicity for Democrats.

When men and women agree to serve in public office, we should treat them with respect and dignity, and that means giving them a prompt confirmation vote. When the Senate fails to give nominees a timely vote, it leaves important positions in our government vacant, and it makes it harder for Presidents of both parties to attract good men and women to serve in these vital posts. If the nominees are unqualified, why doesn't the Senate deny them?

But less important than the qualifications of the nominees, the Senate wants to do the nominating itself.

The Senate refuses to ask the big Constitutional questions about whether the offices (which these nominees would fill) should exist in the first place.

By working together, Republicans and Democrats can chart a better course. We can bring every nomination to the floor for a vote, and give the American people the kind of public servants they deserve. Democrats and Republicans are committed to preserving an unconstitutional tyranny. The best course is Liberty Under God.
Thank you for listening.  

Additional Resources:

Kevin Craig's platform:


Neal Boortz has suggested attaching "The Boortz Addendum" to every appropriation bill offered in Congress. This addendum would read something like this:

Every sponsor or co-sponsor of this legislation hereby affirms his or her belief that the need for the federal government of the United States to spend taxpayer funds on the purposes outlined herein is of greater importance and urgency than any spending needs which the party or parties who actually earned these funds may have; such needs being, but not necessarily limited to, spending for medical care, child care, housing, food, clothing, transportation, education, insurance, savings and retirement planning, and religious tithes or conscientious charity. 

It became common during the Clinton Administration to speak of government spending as an "investment." Congress might also therefore attach the following to each spending bill:

By voting for this legislation I hereby affirm my belief that the information and knowledge possessed by me and 434 other Congressman-"investors" is greater than the collective knowledge and information possessed by a Free Market of 150 million individual investors, pension fund managers, insurance company executives, mutual fund administrators, and brokers, all of whom do not have the luxury of obtaining investment funds by passing a law, but must earn their investment dollars.


Communicating with Government and Media

  • Contact Congress -- this is from the JBS website, powered by "CapWiz," from Capitol Advantage. Lots of organizations use capwiz. If you don't want to go through the JBS, search for capwiz on Google and find another organization that uses it.
    Notice that you can also contact media through this webpage.
  • Action E-List
    Sign up for the JBS Action E-List and be notified when you can make a critical difference on important issues.

John Adams once wrote that the American Revolution began in 1761, when Massachusetts attorney James Otis began legal challenges to the Writs of Assistance. He lost the case, but "American independence," Adams wrote, "was then and there born." Now do the math. That means it took 15 years to convince the rest of America to declare Independence (1776). Then another seven years of war was required before a Peace Treaty was signed (1783), and then six years before the Constitution was finally ratified (1789). That's almost 30 years. (And Jefferson said we shouldn't go 20 years without another rebellion!) How can we hope to convince Americans to fight for principles they were never taught in government schools? We need to be in this battle for the long term. "Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty."


The Democrat Party Radio Address:

This week, New York Congressman Charlie Rangel, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, delivers the Democratic Radio Address, speaking on the "bipartisan" "Economic stimulus package"

Rebates are good, but not enough. Why does the economy need to be stimulated? What can prevent Americans from needing rebates in the first place?
  • equitable tax system
  • unemployment compensation
  • public safety net - universal care, education, old folks
Good question; bad answers. None of these suggestions are going to prevent people from needing assistance. In fact, they are all examples of assistance or compensation. A healthy economy is one where there is an abundance of goods and services at low prices, enabling people to enjoy a prosperous standard of living. Universal health care is not going to provide additional goods and services at lower prices. Neither will taxing the rich more and the middle class less. The Democrats simply don't understand what it takes to create wealth.

Click here for a replay of this edition of the Ozarks Virtual Town Hall