Thank you for your interest in my campaign!
- Why
I am Running for Congress
My
Stand on the Issues
The
Character of a Congressman
Contribute
to the Campaign
The message I am taking to the voters is simple:
You may be thinking,
- "Here we go again with more empty campaign
slogans."
- "Oh, brother; another politician pandering to people
who like the Pledge of Allegiance."
I take the principle very seriously, more consistently,
I believe, than the other candidates. I believe it sums up the
Constitutional principles that made America "the greatest
nation on God's green earth."
I'm committed to
- "Liberty"
because God has given us unalienable rights, which must not be
violated by the government.
- "Under God"
means:
- Liberty, but not license.
- Freedom and personal
responsibility.
- Individual Rights and social
duties.
Republicans worry that I am trying to get rid of too much
government (Liberty: "He's an Anarchist!"),
while the Democrats worry that I am trying to give government too
much power (Under God: "He's imposing a Theocracy!").
The confusion comes from a failure to understand the basic
nature of the system of government which once made America so
respected and admired.
"Liberty Under
God"
They say "Bad publicity is
better than no publicity at all." Let me give you a
little bad publicity, in case you haven't heard it already.
I am running as the Libertarian
Party Candidate. Think of it as "The
Liberty Party." We believe in maximizing
Individual Liberty.
Conservatives and Republicans tend to be frightened by
the Libertarian Agenda, which calls on Congress to re-legalize
drugs, for example. Conservatives believe that without
lots of laws and a strong police-state, chaos, crime and
lawlessness will overwhelm us. I believe such laws create
more problems than they solve. You may even hear someone
say:
"Kevin Craig is some kind of
Anarchist!"
or
"Kevin Craig believes in Abolishing All
Government!"
"Everybody knows" that "anarchists" are
bomb-throwing assassins in search of chaos and destruction of
private property. I passionately oppose such destruction and
disorder. Before I could join the Libertarian Party, I had
to pledge:
I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of
force as a means of achieving political or social goals.
I believe in the peaceful resolution of disputes between
people and between "the People" and their
government. If I have a product or an idea I want to sell to
the American people, I can use reason and eloquence, but not
force.
In our day, however, more than 90% of our government is the
unconstitutional
initiation of force as a means of achieving the political or
social goals of special interests who could not achieve their
goals by persuading the rest of us to support
them.
Kevin Craig is firmly committed as a matter of moral
principle to oppose such initiation of government
force.
More
on the charge of "anarchism." |
Here's more "bad publicity":
I am a Christian. My allegiance to God will always be
greater than my allegiance to any State. I believe that religion
and morality, not the strong-arm of the State, keeps our
houses safe and our economy strong. Happily, every
single person who signed the U.S. Constitution was a
Christian who believed that America had a moral obligation to
be a nation "under
God."
But some are not happy to hear me say that. You may even
hear some say:
"Kevin Craig wants to impose a
Theocracy on America!"
Liberals and Democrats tend to be frightened by talk about
God and morality. They think anyone who believes that religion
should have an impact on law and politics is trying to
establish some kind of "theocracy."
More "bad publicity":
"Kevin Craig does not believe in The
Separation of Church and State!"
These accusations contradict the accusation above, that I
am an "anarchist." I am not out to impose any
religion on anyone using the coercive power of the State. As a
Libertarian, I believe in maximizing individual liberty for
everyone: Christian, Jew, Moslem, Hindu, atheist and agnostic
alike. I would abolish all federal funds to all churches and
all religious organizations, as I would abolish federal
funding of Secular
Humanist organizations. I unqualifiedly oppose the use of
force against people with religious views different from my
own.
The word "Theocracy" means "ruled by
God." A Theocracy is a nation "under God."
America is a nation "under
God," but not a nation under priests, churches,
or "ecclesiastical bodies" (to use the words of
James Madison).
I do not believe in the modern concept of
"separation of church and state." This concept has
been a disaster for America. I believe in the concept which
the Founding Fathers believed in, which might be called
"The Separation of Churches and
State." The modern concept no longer has much to do with
the ecclesiastical bodies known as "churches." Today
the slogan "separation of church and state"
actually means "The Separation of God
and State." The Founding Fathers believed that the
State was "under
God," not separate from God. When the State is
separated from God, the State IS god, or thinks
it is.
America was established as a Christian nation, according to
an
1892 opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court. Members of
non-Christian religions -- Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and
others, as well as atheists and agnostics -- have more freedom
and enjoy higher standards of living in a Christian nation
than they do in an Islamic nation or an atheistic nation. In
and out of Washington, I work harder and more effectively for
the freedom and prosperity of non-Christians than many of
those same non-Christians do.
More
on the charge of "theocracy." |
Why Bother Reading this Web
Page?
The Republican incumbent in this race won the last election with
a staggering 73% of the vote. He has been the incumbent for
four terms. He already has nearly
two million dollars to spend in his campaign. On occasion the
Democratic Party doesn't even bother to run a candidate against him.
This is what you call "a
safe district."
I have no illusions about going to Washington in 2005. Nevertheless,
Your vote for Kevin Craig will not be "wasted."
It will stand out like a sore thumb. Your vote will
send a clear message. This web site describes that
message:
"Liberty Under
God"
- The advantage of having an "anarchist"
working for you in Washington is that nobody is more passionate
in defense of your liberty. Republicans claim victory
when they merely slow down the rate of government growth
and intervention. Libertarians won't be satisfied until
socialism is repudiated and government reduced to the size
intended by the Constitution.
- The advantage of having a defender of "Theocracy"
representing you in Washington is that nobody advocates the idea
of personal responsibility with more passion.
Democrats advocate Government programs of wealth transfer which
are impersonal, bureaucratic, and imposed by force. Libertarians
are champions of self-government.
America was once a Libertarian nation
In 1831, the French political writer Alexis de Tocqueville
visited the United States of America, a nation which, in the eyes of
today's Democrats and Republicans, existed in a state of anarchy.
The citizenry had deemed unnecessary such things as income
taxation, welfare
bureaucracies, Social
Security, Medicare
and Medicaid, public
schooling, drug
wars, economic
regulations, gun
control, and immigration
controls, but the poor were cared for, the elderly were
respected, the illiterate were educated, the streets were safe, and
the economy was flourishing. Tocqueville described the laissez-faire
world of Liberty Under God:
The revolution of the United States was the
result of a mature and dignified taste for freedom, and
not of a vague or ill-defined craving for independence. It
contracted no alliance with the turbulent passions of
anarchy; but its course was marked, on the contrary, by an
attachment to whatever was lawful and orderly.
It was never assumed in the United States that the
citizen of a free country has a right to do whatever he
pleases; on the contrary, social obligations were there
imposed upon him more various than anywhere else. No idea
was ever entertained of attacking the principles or of
contesting the rights of society; but the exercise of its
authority was divided, to the end that the office might be
powerful and the officer insignificant, and that the
community should be at once regulated and free. In no
country in the world does the law hold so absolute a
language as in America, and in no country is the right of
applying it vested in so many hands. The administrative
power in the United States presents nothing either central
or hierarchical in its constitution, which accounts for
its passing, unperceived. The power exists, but its
representative is not to be perceived. |
Only the Libertarian Party has a clear and consistent program to
return government to the limited power the Founding Fathers intended
it to have. Kevin Craig will encourage people of faith and
conscience to take personal responsibility to solve pressing social
problems without government force:
The Bible says "true
religion" is this:
To visit the
fatherless and widows in their affliction
James 1:27
"Compassion"
comes from two Latin words meaning "suffer with." True
concern for the poor means more than "I gave at the
office." It means personal involvement on a local level.
Religion, not Washington D.C., has been the greatest ally of the
poor.
Public "virtue"
is what protects our rights to life, liberty and property, not
the Office of Homeland Security. The heroes of Flight
93 realized that the government was not going to protect them,
and they took personal responsibility to thwart the hijackers.
Subsequent hijackings have been prevented by similar acts of
self-government, not by the elimination of curbside check-in. The
federal government owes the people of New York and the rest of the
world a profound apology for giving Osama bin Laden billions
of dollars in military assistance during the 1980's.
Eliminating domestic liberties is no way to atone for their failed
interventionist foreign policy. America's Founders followed clear
principles of peaceful non-intervention:
The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to
foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations to have
with them as little political connection as possible."
— Washington, Farewell Address (1796)
I deem [one of] the essential principles of our
government, and consequently [one] which ought to shape its
administration … peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all
nations, entangling alliances with none.
— Jefferson, First Inaugural Address (1801)
These simple policies led to America's greatness.
They have been abandoned by both Republicans and Democrats. Only
Libertarians are willing to follow these policies with principled
consistency, even if, as a result, it may be a few years before our
candidates win a seat in Congress.
I advocate the replacement of inefficient bureaucratic government
programs with competitive, efficient Free Market approaches. My
Stand on the Issues is often my vision for comprehensive privatization,
one bureaucracy
at a time. My favorite issues:
The
Character of a Congressman reflects my continuing journey toward
good character. It's a lifelong journey.
I have finished the course work for my Master's Degree in Law and
Theology. My thesis is a defense of "Laissez-Faire
Theocracy." If you're interested in lengthy footnoted
academic discussions and ideas about the distant future, click
here.
Thank you very much for reading!
Kevin Craig
P.O. Box 179
Powersite, MO 65731
KevinCraig@KevinCraig.US
|