The 112th Congress should
- refuse to ratify or fund the proposed
International Criminal Court,
- be wary of defining away sovereignty as a
barrier to military intervention,
- oppose granting the United Nations
war-fighting functions or establishing an on-call UN army, and
- withhold payments to the UN until the
secretary general demonstrates clearer progress in eliminating
inefficiency, mismanagement, and corruption.
- Get US
The United Nations is built on a false
religion, "the religion of humanity." In 1964, R.J. Rushdoony wrote
Religion of the United Nations. John
Foster Dulles, founding
member of the Council on Foreign Relations, delegate to the UN founding
conference, and Eisenhower's first Secretary of State, said of the U.N.:
. . . Some
persons would like to throw out Soviet Russia because we disagree with
their representatives and they with us. A world organization without
Soviet Communists would be a much more pleasant organization. But they
have power in the world, and if the United Nations gets away from that
reality it becomes artificial and exerts less influence. The United
Nations should mirror more accurately, not less accurately, the
reality of what is.
The world must be saved by
law, and law reflects power rather than morality. Indeed,
the United Nations must be beyond good and evil:
I have now come to
believe that the United Nations will best serve the cause of peace if
its Assembly is representative of what the world actually is, and not
merely representative of the parts which we like. Therefore, we ought
to be willing that all the nations should be members without
attempting to appraise closely those which are "good" and
those which are "bad." Already that distinction is
obliterated by the present membership of the United Nations.
Since Man is the new god, the godhead
must be united, and the concepts of good and evil as found in "the
Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" must take second place. The
Soviet Union has power, and power is the ultimate
reality for the
religion of Secular Humanism and for the United Nations.
United Nations is anti-Christian to the core.
Some people say I'm crazy because I'm an
Of course, what I say is, "I
am not an ARCHIST."
is someone who believes he has a right to impose his will on others by
force or threats of violence.
Am I really crazy to say that using
coercion and threatening violence
is unethical and immoral?
Is the following really a crazy thought:
|For the last
few centuries, human beings have tried organizing their
societies using a monopoly of violence called "the
State." The State has done the following in the last 100
- murdered hundreds
of millions of innocent non-combatant civilians
- enslaved billions
of human beings (the Soviets and the Maoists enslaved entire
- stolen (taxed or confiscated
or nationalized) trillions
of dollars of private property.
We have tried the idea of "the
nation-state." It has been a dismal failure. Let's
try a state-less Free Market system.
Is that really a reckless proposal?
things are needed to stop this march of death:
1. persuade the people who wear government uniforms that what they do is
unethical or immoral.
persuade those who salute or vote for these people that their lives will
be improved once we abolish the machinery of death.
people believe that without "governments," criminals --
murderers, thieves and kidnappers -- will
• murder hundreds of innocent non-combatant civilians
• enslave thousands of human beings
• steal millions of dollars of private property.
with the record of "the State" above.
1994, private non-state criminals in the U.S. stole $28 million.
same year, the government stole $2 BILLION -- one hundred times more --
through just one government revenue program: "asset
"But if we abolish the government in
Washington D.C., we will not be able to defend ourselves, and we will be
invaded and enslaved."
all the people who currently wear U.S. government uniforms traded places
with the people who wear government uniforms in Russia or China, would
Americans notice the difference? What difference would it make? Would
your taxes go up if suddenly all U.S. government employees were Chinese?
So let's make this a global project.
persuade human beings in every nation that theft,
murder, and kidnapping
are immoral, even if conducted by people calling themselves "the
Let's abolish the United States using a
treaty with the people of Russia who agree that both
"governments" will resign and disappear simultaneously from
the face of the earth. Let's get rid of all the
nation-states at once. Let's form a non-profit organization to promote
this idea and provide legal blueprints which could be adopted as
treaties by governments as their last official act, abolishing
We could call it, "The United Dis-Nations."
The United Nations was promoted as a
path to peace. The path to peace and a "Vine
& Fig Tree" world
is a state-less path.
Christian Globalism: The
Vine & Fig Tree Worldview
July, 2015: The United Nations supports pro-family policy; The United
States Opposes it.
United States lobbied [against it] with great energy,” says Slater,
noting that pushing the LGBT agenda abroad has become a “primary
objective of our nation's foreign policy.” She even reports that our
delegation threatened to withhold foreign aid to developing nations if
they affirmed the natural family.
West, the Family, and the Big Picture - Breakpoint.org
next: Relations with China