CRAIGforCONGRESS

Missouri's 7th District, U.S. House of Representatives

  
 

 

Testimony Cross-examination
My secret life under 'don't ask, don't tell'
By Joan E. Darrah, Special to CNN February 4, 2010 12:01 p.m. EST
Romans 1:26-27
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature. and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.

tzleft.joan.darrah.courtesy.jpg

Editor's note: Retired Navy Capt. Joan E. Darrah served 29½ years as a naval intelligence officer and was chief of staff and deputy commander at the Office of Naval Intelligence. She has received several awards: three Legion of Merits, three Meritorious Service Medals, three Navy Commendation Medals and the Navy Achievement Medal. Darrah lives with her partner of 19 years, Lynne Kennedy, in Alexandria, Virginia.

This woman has a sad story to tell.  First, she joined the Navy. That's sad. Then she chose to hide the fact that her best friend was a woman. If I had to punish my 14-year old daughter for intolerably rude insubordination and disobedience by grounding her from a concert or looked-forward-to event, she would be sad staying at home on the night of the event, and I would be sad that she was sad, but disobedience has consequences. This woman's punishment is self-imposed. Joan Darrah could have had an open friendship with Lynne Kennedy. But she had declared war on "The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." God defines "marriage" as a relationship between a man and a woman. Darrah defiantly wanted to claim that her relationship with a woman was equal to a "marriage." The Navy does not allow that claim to be made, so Darrah had to keep her relationship a secret in order to keep her job in the Navy. Her story is in the column at left, our response is in this column.

   
(CNN) -- When I first joined the Navy, I had no idea that I was gay. This is a propagandistic statement, evidence of cultural brainwashing, uttered in an attempt to brainwash others. The statement intends to convey as "fact" the idea that a person is or can be homosexual before such an "idea" or choice is formed in the heart, soul, mind, or will. This is like saying, "When I first started teaching kindergarten, I had no idea I was a child molester."
I was well into my career when I realized this fact, but I was doing well as evidenced by the awards and promotions I was receiving. The decision to repudiate the way God created human beings is not a "fact," it is a choice.
In addition, I really enjoyed what I was doing and felt I was making a difference. So I opted to continue to serve, even though I knew that I would have to hide my true identity. I'll bet that when a person signs up for the Navy, a promise is made to abide by Navy rules. Clearly, Ms. Darrah knew that it was against Navy rules to engage in homosexual behavior, but she chose to "hide" her insubordination rather than make a choice to cease violating Navy rules, or leave the Navy. It's not just that she violated a Navy order and refused to say "I'm sorry" or accept the consequences. She deliberately chose to maintain an on-going continuing violation of Navy rules.

This may be why 97% of military brass opposed Clinton's unconstitutional, pro-homosexual interference in military affairs back in 1993: When a person chooses to disregard "The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" at one point, that person has chosen in principle to disregard all laws by disregarding the Lawmaker. This is what makes a homosexual dangerous in an institution where obedience to authority is critical.

For most of my career in the Navy, I lived two lives and went to work each day wondering if that would be my last. Whenever the admiral would call me to his office, 99.9 percent of me was certain that it was to discuss an operational issue. But there was always that fear in the back of my mind that somehow I had been "outed," and he was calling me to his office to tell me that I was fired. It is apparent that hiding an ongoing violation of Navy policy destroys "esprit de corps." Guilt and suspicion cause hesitation and second-thoughts, interfering with the rapid obedience required in the military.
So many simple things that straight people take for granted could have ended my career, even a comment such as "My partner and I went to the movies last night." Saying "My best friend and I went to the movies last night" would not end her career in the Navy. But she insisted on saying, "I went to the movies last night with someone with whom I violate Navy policy and The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God in a systematic, on-going manner."
In spite of the stress of living under "don't ask, don't tell" and the constant fear of losing my job, somehow my partner, Lynne Kennedy, an openly gay reference librarian at the Library of Congress, and I had learned to deal with the policy and make the requisite sacrifices. Except the sacrifice of actually obeying Navy rules against homosexual conduct.
I had pretended to be straight and played the games most gays in the military are all too familiar with --
• not daring to have a picture of Lynne on my desk,
• being reluctant to go out to dinner with her,
• telling her not to call me at work except in a real emergency,
• not going to church together,
• avoiding shopping for groceries together
• and generally staying out of sight of anyone I knew when we were together.
I didn't want to have to lie about who Lynne was or have someone conclude that we were more than casual friends.
None of these things would have been prohibited if Darrah did not insist on her right to publicly violate The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, and to defy God's institution of marriage. They didn't have to be "no more than casual friends"; they could have been really, really close friends, as long as they weren't claiming that they had a right to violate The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, and to defy God's institution of marriage.
But it was the events of September 11, 2001, that caused me to appreciate fully the true impact of "don't ask, don't tell" on our lives. What follows is not the impact of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (or more accurately, the policy against homosexuality), it is the impact of Darrah's attempt to conceal on-going insubordination.
At 8:30 a.m. on September 11, I went to a meeting in the Pentagon. At 9:30 a.m. I left that meeting. At 9:37 a.m., American Airlines Flight No. 77 slammed into the Pentagon and destroyed the exact space I had left less than eight minutes earlier, killing seven of my colleagues.  
In the days and weeks that followed, I went to several funerals and memorial services for shipmates who had been killed. Most of my co-workers attended these services with their spouses whose support was critical at this difficult time, yet I was forced to go alone. "Forced" only by her own defiance of God's Law and Navy law. She was unwilling to be "very close friends," insisting on a perverse substitute for marriage and the right to attack God's Law.
As the numbness began to wear off, it hit me how incredibly alone Lynne would have been had I been killed. The military is known for how it pulls together and helps people; we talk of the "military family," which is a way of saying we always look after each other, especially in times of need. But none of that support would have been available for Lynne, because under "don't ask, don't tell," she couldn't exist. She could have existed as Darrah's "best friend," just not as Darrah's "husband" or "wife."
In fact, Lynne would have been one of the last people to know had I been killed, because nowhere in my paperwork or emergency contact information had I dared to list her name. Darrah certainly could have listed her name, but chose not to because she chose to engage perpetually in conduct "unbecoming an officer."
This realization caused us to stop and reassess exactly what was most important in our lives. During that process, we realized that the "don't ask, don't tell" policy was causing us to make a much bigger sacrifice than either of us had ever admitted. Eight months later, in June 2002, I retired after more than 29 years in the U.S. Navy, an organization I will always love and respect. Love and respect, but not obey.
We are now committed to doing everything we possibly can to get rid of "don't ask, don't tell" so that our military can finally be open to all qualified and motivated individuals who want to serve their country. A person who is serving perverse lusts rather than God cannot serve their country, if their country is a nation "under God."
As a retired naval officer, I am especially pleased with the leadership that Navy Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has demonstrated on repeal of "don't ask, don't tell." I believe that the end of the policy is in sight. I have every confidence that our military will easily adjust to this change and that with strong leadership, we will ultimately be stronger and better for it. Permitting and even approving continued violation of The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God does not make an institution "stronger" or "better."
Ironically, it was in the military that I learned to work with people of different backgrounds, different religions, different ethnicities and different skin colors and to focus on getting the mission accomplished. I learned the importance of respecting everyone and judging people on their performance and abilities, not on a preconceived prejudice. The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God are not simply a "prejudice." This is not a matter of personal taste or even social convention. Human beings are created by God male and female. God has explained this situation to us. This issue of ethics and morality is fundamental to who we are as human beings. The Declaration of Independence is not a mere "prejudice." This issue here is not "bigotry," "prejudice," or even military policy. The issue is, What is the nature of the human species; what is the reality of morality. The issue is nothing less than whether America is a nation "under God" or a nation at war with God. The issue is much bigger than Darrah and her friend.
Twenty-six countries allow gays to serve openly in their militaries, and from all reports, things are going just fine. This is the right step for our country, our military and for gay people both currently serving and those who would like to be part of the world's finest military. I have great love and respect for our country, but I know we can do better than "don't ask, don't tell." "Repent" will always be better than "don't ask, don't tell."

The opinions in this commentary are solely those of Joan E. Darrah.

 

Government Morality and Culture Domestic Foreign