June 5, 2006 Issue
Copyright © 2006 The American Conservative
by Patrick J. Buchanan
“Why do they hate us?” So stunned Americans asked, after 9/11, when we learned that across the Arab world, many were saying, “The Americans had it coming.”
For a textbook example of why we are hated, consider Gaza and the West Bank. There, a brutal Israeli/U.S.-led cutoff in aid has been imposed on the Palestinians for voting the wrong way in a free election.
Immediately after Hamas’s victory, Israel halted the $55 million a month the Palestinian Authority received as its share of tax and customs revenue. Israel demanded Europe and the U.S. also end all aid to the PA until Hamas renounces terror, recognizes Israel, and disarms.
President Bush, though he was conducting a worldwide crusade for democracy and had urged that the Palestinian elections be held and Hamas participate, obediently complied. For months now, U.S. and European aid to the PA, half its budget, has been halted.
The early returns are in. “Surgeons at Gaza’s biggest hospital,” says the Financial Times, “have suspended non-essential surgery for lack of sutures, laboratory kits and anesthetics.” Environmental protection agency workers have no money for petrol to monitor sewage and industrial waste entering the water supply. Some 150,000 civil servants, 60,000 of them armed security personnel, have gone unpaid for months.
Supermarkets have to extend credit to customers who have no money for food. The Washington Post relates an incident that gives a flavor of what is happening.
“In Gaza’s gold market Monday, Nahed al-Zayim stared at the wedding ring her husband, a Palestinian police officer, gave her six years ago. She had placed it on a glass counter offering it for sale, joining several other wives of public employees who had not been paid in two months.
“Her head covered by a black veil, Zayim said she needed the proceeds from her ring to buy diapers and milk supplements for her three children, including Hazem, 4, who tugged at her tunic in the afternoon bustle. ‘This is the last one, we have no more,’ Zayim, 28, said of her ring.”
Woodrow Wilson called sanctions “the silent, deadly remedy.” Its victims are always the sick, the elderly, the women, and the children.
In March, the World Bank predicted the aid cutoff would lead to a 30 percent fall in average personal incomes among the Palestinians. The bank now considers that prediction “too rosy” and expects “the worst year in the West Bank and Gaza’s recent dismal economic history.”
Already, violent clashes have broken out between Hamas and Fatah. There is a danger of collapse of the Palestinian Authority, chaos, and a need for the Israeli army to intervene anew to restore order. Finally, May 9, under European pressure, the U.S. relented and a trickle of aid began to flow.
Query: who, besides al-Qaeda and recruiters of suicide bombers, can conceivably benefit from persecuting the Palestinian people like this? Does President Bush or Condi Rice think the Palestinians will respect an America that did this to their children, after we urged this election, called for Hamas to participate, and preached our devotion to democracy?
“The aid cut-off appears to be increasing anti-U.S. sentiment here,” writes the Post’s Scott Wilson, quoting 33-year-old pharmacist Mustafa Hasoona: “The problem is the West, not us. If they don’t respect democracy, they shouldn’t call for it. We are with this government we elected. I voted for it.”
According to the Financial Times, Hamas is winning converts for refusing to buckle. Said Khalil Abu Leila, a Hamas leader, “They have misunderstood the Arab mentality. As long as the pressure increases on Hamas, the more popular it will become.”
The White House says we don’t negotiate with terrorists. But when we had to, we did. FDR and Truman summited with Stalin at Yalta and Potsdam. Nixon met with Mao in Beijing. Kissinger negotiated with the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese at Paris. Bush I allied with Assad in the Gulf War. Clinton had Arafat to the White House too many times to count.
Rabin and Peres shared a Nobel Prize with Arafat. Netanyahu gave him Hebron. Barak offered him 95 percent of the West Bank.
Bush’s agents negotiated with the architect of the Lockerbie massacre to persuade Colonel Khaddafi to give up his WMD. In 2004, Bush’s men called it a victory for Bush diplomacy. Khaddafi’s regime had been at the top of the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terror.
The purpose of U.S.-Israeli policy today is to punish the Palestinians for how they voted and to force Hamas to yield or to collapse its government. How does such a policy win hearts and minds for America?
Terrorism has been described as waging war on innocents to break their political leaders. Is that not a fair description of what we are doing to the Palestinians? No wonder they hate us. June 5, 2006 Issue

![]()
![]()
ChatGPT:
There are several well-documented reports that lay out Palestinian grievances against Israeli policies, often from the perspective of human-rights bodies or international legal observers. Here are a few you can read that many sympathetic analysts cite as credible and grounded in evidence:
A report from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights details decades-long patterns of discrimination in the Occupied Palestinian Territory — including unequal legal treatment, land confiscation, restrictions on access to resources, and harsher use of force since October 2023. (OHCHR)
The UN Human Rights Council’s Independent International Commission of Inquiry has produced extensive documentation on alleged violations of international humanitarian law and human rights abuses in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and Gaza, including reports submitted to the Human Rights Council with detailed findings and recommendations. (OHCHR)
These reports cover a wide range of issues including settlement expansion, discrimination, violence against civilians, and the conduct of hostilities.
An official commission report presented at the UN Human Rights Council concluded — based on its mandate — that actions taken by Israel in Gaza over an extended period may constitute failure to prevent or actual commission of genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention. (Wikipedia)
Whether or not you agree with the terminology, this is a major sympathetic legal analysis and is widely referenced in international discourse.
Human Rights Watch’s 2021 report Threshold Crossed documents longstanding discriminatory policies toward Palestinians, including legal structures that privilege Jewish Israelis and restrict Palestinian freedoms across the West Bank and Gaza. (Human Rights Watch)
This is a well-researched human-rights report often cited by academics, legal scholars, and advocacy groups.
The 2023 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices from the U.S. State Department include credible reporting on:
arbitrary detentions,
unlawful killings,
denial of emergency medical access to Palestinians,
and other human-rights concerns. (State Department)
These reports are not advocacy publications — they are government-sourced human-rights assessments often treated as authoritative.
For ongoing instances showing patterns Palestinians often cite as part of their grievances:
Reports of settler violence and displacement of Palestinians in the West Bank. (Reuters)
UN officials characterizing humanitarian conditions in Gaza as “horrifying” due to siege conditions. (AP News)
Allegations of severe mistreatment or deaths in Israeli detention. (Reuters)
These news reports don’t replace formal analyses but illustrate the lived realities underlying grievances.
Sympathetic analyses of Palestinian grievances often point to:
Longstanding occupation and settlement policy contrary to international law
Systemic discrimination between citizens and subjects under different legal regimes
Restrictions on movement, resources, and civil rights
Patterns of excessive force, harassment, and lack of accountability
Severe humanitarian conditions in Gaza
These are framed not as excuses for violence but as contextual explanations for why grievances are so deep — which is the kind of perspective you’re looking for.
If you want, I can also point you to:
legal briefs arguing specific Palestinian claims under international law, or
academic summaries that compile grievances chronologically with citations.
Previously edited; Sunday, August 15, 2010, 12:48:53 AM