CRAIGforCONGRESS

Missouri's 7th District, U.S. House of Representatives

  
 

 

 

Congressional Issues 2010
MISSOURI FARM BUREAU
Health



Missouri Farm Bureau

Kevin Craig - "Liberty Under God"

General  
As the First Responder program is developed, state and federal cost-share money for emergency equipment should be provided as rural counties have the trained volunteers to use the equipment.  
We oppose more restrictive supervision rules for physician assistants and/or nurse practitioners.  
County Health Services  
We oppose any proposal calling for a premium tax on health service contracts and insurance premiums to fund community health services.  
Emergency Medical Services Personnel  
We believe emergency medical services personnel should receive special training to equip them to handle farm-related accidents.  
We support adoption of EMTI license process for the state of Missouri as a whole.  
Health Care Reform Federal health care programs should not be reformed, they should be abolished entirely.
We believe that health care is primarily the responsibility of the individual. We strongly support efforts to improve the present health care delivery system. Future health care policy changes should embrace the following principles: Not just "primarily," but exclusively, vis-a-vis the government.
1. Promotion of personal wellness, fitness and preventive care as basic health goals;  
2. Minimal government intervention in decisions between providers and receivers of health care;  
3. Patient's right to choose physicians and methods of treatment;  
4. Federal tax policies that encourage individuals to prepare for health care needs;  
5. We favor a minimum of 90 days between date of notification and date of cancellation of a health insurance group. We also favor more affordable options for those being cancelled.  
We oppose National Health Insurance or a public option. We are also opposed to any form of socialized medicine.  
We support allowing individuals to purchase health insurance policies across state lines.  
We continue to oppose state financed programs to provide health insurance coverage for Missouri citizens.  
We support the concept of a voucher system to enable individuals to purchase a bare-bones private health insurance policy.  
We favor elimination of unnecessary government regulations and red tape which are prime contributors to high medical costs. Yes, but a completely Free Market in health care is the goal.
We encourage the health care industry to publish pricing guidelines for the most common medical procedures and services offered to patients in order to allow individuals a better chance to assess and control their medical costs.  
To insure that healthcare, particularly in rural areas, will not be further eroded, resolve that Farm Bureau join with other healthcare organizations to support recently enacted measures to address the problem of the spiraling cost of malpractice insurance and the decline in the number of insurance providers for hospital and physician malpractice insurance.  
We favor a ceiling on medical malpractice settlements. If you were on a jury and all the facts indicated a settlement of X dollars was just and fair, would you want there to be a federal law capping your award at X-1? Why should Congress pre-empt the conclusions of a jury? Ignorant juries should not be compounded with ignorant politicians.
We encourage health care providers, health insurance companies, hospital administrators and others involved in the health care industry to cooperate whenever possible to help contain health care costs. Some examples of cost containment ideas which we support include elimination of duplicate services and cost shifting, sharing of facilities and specialized equipment, creation of more satellite clinics and increased use of non-physician providers. The best way to contain costs is for patients to assume full financial responsibility and decision-making. Neal McClusky has accurately observed,

Finally, there is the famously skyrocketing cost of health care. Its cause is no mystery. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in 2002 nearly 46 percent of personal health care expenditures were covered by the government, and after insurance only about 14 percent were covered directly by patients. That's right: the people demanding the treatments picked up only 14 cents of every dollar spent on them. So long, economizing!

We support the concept of tax preferred medical savings accounts which would provide an incentive for individuals and families to build up savings to pay for future medical expenses.  
We believe regulation of the health insurance industry should remain a function of state government and should not be shifted to the federal government. Government does not do as good a job regulating any industry as the Free Market.
We encourage health insurance companies and health care providers to place more emphasis on preventative care practices especially in the area of education programs.  
Home Health Care  
We believe home health care agencies, especially those that are small and located in rural areas, have been devastated by changes in the federal payment structure. We support efforts to resolve funding problems in a manner that ensures access and does not jeopardize small businesses.  
Medical Information Data Bases  
We oppose the establishment of a National Data Base of personal medical information.  
Medical Schools  
We believe admittance to medical schools should be based on academic qualifications rather than referrals.  
We believe medical schools should expand their programs to allow more students to be accepted into the medical programs.  
Nutrition Information  
We believe that variety, moderation and balance are the cornerstones of a healthy diet.  
We support accurate labeling of food products for consumers.  
We oppose deceptive marketing and promotion and/or label claims pertaining to dairy and other food products, implying superiority when compared to other products not bearing such claims.  
Rural Health Care  
We support corrective legislation which would allow rural doctors and hospitals to receive the same reimbursement rates for Medicare/Medicaid treated patients as currently provided to urban health care providers.  
We support a program by state government in cooperation with local individuals and institutions which would provide economic incentives for doctors and registered nurses and licensed practical nurses to practice in rural areas. One such program would be a state-sponsored loan program for medical students and other medical health care professionals with partial forgiveness of the loan if they establish and maintain a practice in a rural area for at least five years.  
We support the rural-focused programs of the Missouri Area Health Education Centers (MAHEC), which recruits and provides educational assistance for students from rural areas who are preparing to enter health professions and who will practice in rural areas.  
We support state funding for the MAHEC separate from, and in addition to, funds currently provided through the Primary Care Resource Initiative for Missouri (PRIMO) program.  
We urge consideration of a program to allow health insurance carriers to offer lower priced, no-frills health insurance policies that are not required to contain the various state-mandated health benefits.  
We support greater use of non-physician providers to help relieve personnel shortages in underserved rural areas. Medical licensing is a major source of increasing medical costs.
We encourage county Farm Bureaus to work cooperatively with other local organizations to help organize and conduct effective physician recruitment programs in their respective rural communities and to explore other local solutions to rural health problems.  

next: Insurance

Table of Contents