Your Vote Can Send a Message:
Liberty Under
God
If your vote doesn't send this message,
what message will it send?
|
Kevin
Craig
|
My name is Kevin Craig and I am a candidate for Congress
because I want you to use your vote to send a clear and strong
message to your current congressman.
The incumbent will probably be re-elected to Congress
(barring some unforeseen divine intervention). In the last
election 8 out of 10 voters voted for our current Congressman.
Voters will probably vote the same way in the 2006 election.
Experts call this a "safe district."
On the day after Election Day, political pundits and media
commentators will analyze the election results and declare the
"meaning" of your vote. They will say that voters like
you voted to pay more taxes and approved of a bigger, more
atheistic federal government. Why? Because that's what your
current Congressman votes for. When he was first elected to
Congress in 1996, the
Republican Party National Platform promised the following:
As a first step
in reforming government, we support elimination of the
Departments of Commerce, Housing and Urban Development,
Education, and Energy, and the elimination, defunding or
privatization of agencies which are obsolete, redundant, of
limited value, or too regional in focus. Examples of agencies we
seek to defund or to privatize are the National Endowment for
the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the
Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and the Legal Services
Corporation.
The National
Endowment for the Arts was notorious for its subsidizing of
anti-Christian, pornographic
“art,” including “art” which featured a figure of
Jesus Christ submerged in a container of the
"artist’s" urine. These programs mock the idea of
"Liberty Under
God," and undermine the very heart and soul of
America.
And yet, our incumbent Congressman has not only failed
to abolish these unconstitutional agencies, he has
consistently voted to INCREASE funding for these agencies.
These unconstitutional agencies are now far more powerful than
they were during the Clinton Administration.
Many other examples are found below. Let
me make an even more dramatic claim:
If America's Founding Fathers could travel through time
from 1776 to 2006, what would they think about our current
Congressman's voting record? Who would the men who risked
"our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor" vote
for?
I believe they would be angered at what Washington D.C. has
done to the nation they created. The more you know about
America's Founding Fathers, the more quickly you'll conclude
that they would vote for Kevin Craig. But even more certainly,
America's Founding Fathers would denounce a vote for our
current Congressman as "unAmerican" and
"unChristian."
That's correct: unAmerican and unChristian. The evidence is
overwhelming.
Here is some more evidence:
- On June 27, 2003, our present Congressman voted for an
unconstitutional prescription drug benefit plan that will
add nearly $4,000 to your tax bill. Click
here for details.
- On July 16, 2003 and July 22, 2003, the incumbent voted
for bills that expand the power of the atheistic United
Nations and undercut American sovereignty. Click
here for details.
- On April 30, 2003, our current Congressman voted for more
federal control over your local schools. Click
here for details. More federal control over your schools
diminishes the chances of students in your neighborhood
knowing how to read, knowing right from wrong, and knowing
the values that made America the most admired nation on
earth.
- On July 24, 2003, our Congressman took steps toward
creating a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA)
that would place America under the control of a regional
government that is not bound "by the chains of the
Constitution" (Thomas Jefferson)
- In fact, our current Congressmen has set in motion a
plan to abolish the United States and merge
the United States and Mexico into a new
government. If you haven't heard about this, you need to
click
here.
You can see more examples of your current Congressman's
voting record here,
here,
here,
here,
and here.
- On these important matters, every other vote by our
Congressman undercuts the principle upon which this country
was built. On balance, our present Congressman ignores the
Constitution at least 50% of the time. Which 50% do you
support? What message are you sending with your vote?
Always vote for
principle, though you may vote alone,
and you may cherish the sweetest
reflection that your vote is never
lost.
-- John Quincy Adams |
|
|
Your vote for Kevin Craig will send a message to the
incumbent to pay attention to the Constitution, and cast votes
which are consistent with the principle of Liberty
Under God. A vote for Kevin
Craig speaks louder and more clearly than a vote for the
incumbent. You may not be able to vote for a "winner,"
but you can vote for a great principle. Which would America's
Founding Fathers approve of?
If you're a Christian, you need to ask this question:
Is it a SIN to
Vote for Roy Blunt?
http://isitaSINtovoteforRoyBlunt.com
|
Roy Blunt himself is not the problem. The
problem is government power, and the fact that both Republicans
and Democrats worship government power. "Power tends to
corrupt," as Lord
Acton wisely put it. Both major parties are composed of good
people with good intentions, but they have been seduced by the
idea that the sword can be our savior, and that they are better
able to wield the sword and govern us than we are.
- From time to time
we've been tempted to believe that society has become
too complex to be managed by self-rule, that
government by an elite group is superior to government
for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one among us
is capable of governing himself, then who among us has
the capacity to govern someone else?
In this present crisis, government is not the
solution to our problem; government is the problem.
- -- President Ronald Reagan, First
Inaugural Address
|
If you want to vote for a
"winner,"
Don't Vote for
Kevin Craig
Vote for AMERICA
It's time for Missouri voters to recognize that the two-party
system which has controlled America for the last 80 years has
only one goal: to remain in power. Nearly everyone in
Congress has violated his or her oath to
"support the Constitution." The men who wrote and
signed the Constitution would not
recognize the government they created. This is the year you need
to vote for America and not
for the same old political party.
In his "Farewell Address," George Washington warned
against excessive allegiance to any political party:
Let me now . . . warn you in the most solemn manner against
the baneful effects of the spirit of party. . . . The common
and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient
to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to
discourage and restrict it. It serves always to distract the
public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It
agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false
alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another . .
. . In governments purely elective, it [the spirit of party]
is a spirit not to be encouraged.
You must put America ahead of either political party.
And you must vote to make sure that America is Under God.
Benjamin Rush signed the
Declaration of Independence and served in the Presidential
administrations of John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James
Madison -- each of whom came from a different political party.
And of what party was Rush?
I have been alternately called an aristocrat and a
democrat. I am now neither. I am a Christocrat. I
believe all power. . . will always fail of producing order and
happiness in the hands of man. He alone Who created and
redeemed man is qualified to govern him.
Our rights, says the Declaration of Independence, do not come
from the Republicans or the Democrats. They do not come from
Washington D.C. We are endowed by our Creator with
our rights.
Who Will Abolish America?
When you go to the polls in November, you will be voting on
WHO will abolish America. Not whether America is
abolished, but WHO will abolish America. That sounds radical,
even crazy. You must learn the facts. You must become an
informed voter. Click here for
details about the plan to abolish America. If America's
Founding Fathers were here today, they too would vote to abolish
the United States.
- They took up arms against taxes which were only one-tenth
as burdensome as today's taxes.
- They exercised their right to "alter
or abolish" a tyrannical government that would
never have dreamed of giving government grants to
pornographers, abortion-providers, land-owners who won't
grow anything for others, drug-users, and tens of thousands
of "pork-barrel" projects -- in exchange for votes
and other bribes given out by special interests.
Washington D.C. is the greatest threat on earth to the ideal
of "Liberty Under
God." The United States as we know it today --
the United States as created by the two-party monopoly over the
last 100 years -- will be and must be abolished. The Republicans
and Democrats are going to abolish the U.S.A. and replace it
with more of the same:
a regional mega-state, merging the United States and Mexico, and
eventually all of North and South America. It will be called a
"Free Trade" zone, but it will be a new
government, with new courts, new legislative powers, and new
executives, none of which will be "bound
down by the chains of the Constitution." Did you click this
link yet?
Imagine a "new" America where:
- You run a successful business without ever filling out a
government form or wondering if you might be violating some
senseless government regulation.
- You gain a profound sense of satisfaction by supporting
valuable charities and investing in life-enhancing
technologies, ever since your take-home pay increased by
more than $15,000 a year when the
Income Tax was abolished.
- The young college-aged clerk you hired can read complete
sentences, do simple math, be trusted with company assets,
and treat your customers with
courtesy and respect.
- Children are taught in school that God says not to steal,
not to kill, and not to rape, and that God has created all
of us with unalienable rights.
You'll never ever know such an America if you keep voting for
the same old politicians. Neither will your children.
Kevin Craig is the only candidate for Congress who knows that
America's greatness depends on a simple formula. It's an idea so
old it sounds radically new:
|
Thank you for your interest in my campaign!
- Why I am Running for Congress
My Stand on the Issues
The Character of a Congressman
Contribute to the Campaign
The message I am taking to the voters is simple:
You may be thinking,
- "Here we go again with more empty campaign
slogans."
- "Oh, brother; another politician pandering to people
who like the Pledge of Allegiance."
I take the principle very seriously, more
consistently, I believe, than the other candidates. I believe it
sums up the Constitutional principles that made America
"the greatest nation on God's green earth."
I'm committed to
- "Liberty"
because God has given us unalienable rights, which must not
be violated by the government.
- "Under God"
means:
- Liberty, but not license.
- Freedom and personal
responsibility.
- Individual Rights and social
duties.
Republicans worry that I am trying to get rid of too much
government (Liberty: "He's an Anarchist!"),
while the Democrats worry that I am trying to give government
too much power (Under God: "He's imposing a Theocracy!").
The confusion comes from a failure to understand the basic
nature of the system of government which once made America so
respected and admired.
"Liberty Under
God"
They say "Bad publicity is
better than no publicity at all." Let me give you a
little bad publicity, in case you haven't heard it
already.
I am running as the Libertarian
Party Candidate. Think of it as "The
Liberty Party." We believe in maximizing
Individual Liberty.
Conservatives and Republicans tend to be frightened by
the Libertarian Agenda, which calls on Congress to re-legalize
drugs, for example. Conservatives believe that without
lots of laws and a strong police-state, chaos, crime and
lawlessness will overwhelm us. I believe such laws create
more problems than they solve. You may even hear someone
say:
"Kevin Craig is some kind of
Anarchist!"
or
"Kevin Craig believes in Abolishing All
Government!"
"Everybody knows" that "anarchists"
are bomb-throwing assassins in search of chaos and
destruction of private property. I passionately oppose such
destruction and disorder. Before I could join the
Libertarian Party, I had
to pledge:
I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of
force as a means of achieving political or social goals.
I believe in the peaceful resolution of disputes between
people and between "the People" and their
government. If I have a product or an idea I want to sell to
the American people, I can use reason and eloquence, but not
force.
In our day, however, more than 90% of our government is
the unconstitutional
initiation of force as a means of achieving the political or
social goals of special interests who could not achieve
their goals by persuading the rest of us to
support them.
Kevin Craig is firmly committed as a matter of moral
principle to oppose such initiation of government
force.
More on the charge of
"anarchism."
|
Here's more "bad publicity":
I am a Christian. My allegiance to God will always be
greater than my allegiance to any State. I believe that religion
and morality, not the strong-arm of the State, keeps our
houses safe and our economy strong. Happily, every
single person who signed the U.S. Constitution was a
Christian who believed that America had a moral obligation
to be a nation "under
God."
But some are not happy to hear me say that. You may even
hear some say:
"Kevin Craig wants to impose a
Theocracy on America!"
Liberals and Democrats tend to be frightened by talk
about God and morality. They think anyone who believes that
religion should have an impact on law and politics is trying
to establish some kind of "theocracy."
More "bad publicity":
"Kevin Craig does not believe in
The Separation of Church and State!"
These accusations contradict the accusation above, that I
am an "anarchist." I am not out to impose any
religion on anyone using the coercive power of the State. As
a Libertarian, I believe in maximizing individual liberty
for everyone: Christian, Jew, Moslem, Hindu, atheist and
agnostic alike. I would abolish all federal funds to all
churches and all religious organizations, as I would abolish
federal funding of Secular
Humanist organizations. I unqualifiedly oppose the use
of force against people with religious views different from
my own.
The word "Theocracy" means "ruled by
God." A Theocracy is a nation "under God."
America is a nation "under
God," but not a nation under priests,
churches, or "ecclesiastical bodies" (to use the
words of James Madison).
I do not believe in the modern concept of
"separation of church and state." This concept has
been a disaster for America. I believe in the concept which
the Founding Fathers believed in, which might be called
"The Separation of Churches and
State." The modern concept no longer has much to do
with the ecclesiastical bodies known as
"churches." Today the slogan "separation of church
and state" actually means "The Separation of God
and State." The Founding Fathers believed that the
State was "under
God," not separate from God. When the State is
separated from God, the State IS god, or
thinks it is.
America was established as a Christian nation, according
to an
1892 opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court. Members of
non-Christian religions -- Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, and
others, as well as atheists and agnostics -- have more
freedom and enjoy higher standards of living in a Christian
nation than they do in an Islamic nation or an atheistic
nation. In and out of Washington, I work harder and more
effectively for the freedom and prosperity of non-Christians
than many of those same non-Christians do.
More on the charge of
"theocracy."
|
Why Bother Reading this Web
Page?
The Republican incumbent in this race won the last election
with a staggering 73% of the vote. He has been the
incumbent for five terms. He already has nearly
two million dollars to spend in his campaign. On occasion the
Democratic Party doesn't even bother to run a candidate against
him. This is what you call "a
safe district."
I have no illusions about going to Washington in 2007. Nevertheless,
Your vote for Kevin Craig will not be "wasted."
It will stand out like a sore thumb. Your vote will
send a clear message. This web site describes that
message:
"Liberty Under
God"
- The advantage of having an "anarchist"
working for you in Washington is that nobody is more
passionate in defense of your liberty. Republicans
claim victory when they merely slow down the
rate of government growth and intervention.
Libertarians won't be satisfied until socialism is repudiated
and government reduced to the size intended by the Constitution.
- The advantage of having a defender of "Theocracy"
representing you in Washington is that nobody advocates the
idea of personal responsibility with more
passion. Democrats advocate Government programs of wealth
transfer which are impersonal, bureaucratic, and imposed by
force. Libertarians are champions of self-government.
America was once a Libertarian nation
In 1831, the French political writer Alexis de Tocqueville
visited the United States of America, a nation which, in the eyes
of today's Democrats and Republicans, existed in a state of
anarchy. The citizenry had deemed unnecessary such things as income
taxation, welfare bureaucracies, Social
Security, Medicare and Medicaid, public
schooling, drug wars, economic
regulations, gun control, and immigration
controls, but the poor were cared for, the elderly were
respected, the illiterate were educated, the streets were safe,
and the economy was flourishing. Tocqueville described the
laissez-faire world of Liberty Under God:
The revolution of the United States was the
result of a mature and dignified taste for freedom, and
not of a vague or ill-defined craving for independence. It
contracted no alliance with the turbulent passions of
anarchy; but its course was marked, on the contrary, by an
attachment to whatever was lawful and orderly.
It was never assumed in the United States that the
citizen of a free country has a right to do whatever he
pleases; on the contrary, social obligations were there
imposed upon him more various than anywhere else. No idea
was ever entertained of attacking the principles or of
contesting the rights of society; but the exercise of its
authority was divided, to the end that the office might be
powerful and the officer insignificant, and that the
community should be at once regulated and free. In no
country in the world does the law hold so absolute a
language as in America, and in no country is the right of
applying it vested in so many hands. The administrative
power in the United States presents nothing either central
or hierarchical in its constitution, which accounts for
its passing, unperceived. The power exists, but its
representative is not to be perceived. |
Only the Libertarian Party has a clear and consistent program
to return government to the limited power the Founding Fathers
intended it to have. Kevin Craig will encourage people of faith
and conscience to take personal responsibility to solve pressing
social problems without government force:
The Bible says "true
religion" is this:
To visit the
fatherless and widows in their affliction
James 1:27
"Compassion"
comes from two Latin words meaning "suffer with." True
concern for the poor means more than "I gave at the
office." It means personal involvement on a local level.
Religion, not Washington D.C., has been the greatest ally of the
poor.
Public "virtue"
is what protects our rights to life, liberty and property, not
the Office of Homeland Security. The heroes of Flight
93 realized that the government was not going to protect them,
and they took personal responsibility to thwart the hijackers.
Subsequent hijackings have been prevented by similar acts of
self-government, not by the elimination of curbside check-in. The
federal government owes the people of New York and the rest of the
world a profound apology for giving Osama bin Laden billions
of dollars in military assistance during the 1980's.
Eliminating domestic liberties is no way to atone for their failed
interventionist foreign policy. America's Founders followed clear
principles of peaceful non-intervention:
The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to
foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations to have
with them as little political connection as
possible."
— Washington, Farewell Address (1796)
I deem [one of] the essential principles of our
government, and consequently [one] which ought to shape its
administration … peace, commerce, and honest friendship with
all nations, entangling alliances with none.
— Jefferson, First Inaugural Address (1801)
These simple policies led to America's greatness.
They have been abandoned by both Republicans and Democrats. Only
Libertarians are willing to follow these policies with principled
consistency, even if, as a result, it may be a few years before
our candidates win a seat in Congress.
I advocate the replacement of inefficient bureaucratic
government programs with competitive, efficient Free Market
approaches. My
Stand on the Issues is often my vision for comprehensive privatization,
one bureaucracy at a time. My
favorite issues:
The
Character of a Congressman reflects my continuing journey
toward good character. It's a lifelong journey.
I have finished the course work for my Master's Degree in Law
and Theology. My thesis is a defense of "Laissez-Faire
Theocracy." If you're interested in lengthy footnoted
academic discussions and ideas about the distant future, click
here.
Thank you very much for reading!
Kevin Craig
P.O. Box 179
Powersite, MO 65731
KevinCraig@KevinCraig.US
www.STOPtheSPP.US
|
|